Abiogênese: Thomas Huxley 'falou e disse' que sua opinião era um ato de fé filosófica

terça-feira, agosto 18, 2009

Qualquer livro didático de Biologia do ensino médio aprovado pelo MEC/SEMTEC/PNLEM relata que a abiogênese foi refutada por Pasteur. Contudo, logo em seguida, numa ação que eu chamo de Abracadabra epistêmico, a versão consensual da Nomenklatura científica, a abiogênese ganha status de ciência corroborada pelas evidências. É ciência ou ideologia? É ciência ou filosofia?

Thomas Huxley foi muito mais honesto do que muitos cientistas ao dizer o que pensava de sua opinião sobre a questão da abiogênese:

"Eu peço a você mais uma vez para relembrar que eu não tenho direito de chamar minha opinião de nada a não ser um ato de fé filosófica". [1]

Nossos alunos estão sendo engabelados por esses livros escandalosamente aprovados pelo MEC/SEMTEC/PNLEM, porque Pasteur detonou de vez a abiogênese. O que temos como sendo uma versão científica nada mais é do que fé filosófica materialista que não é substanciada pelas evidências no contexto de justificação teórica.

Chamam isso de educação. Eu chamo de 171 epistêmico, oops doutrinação filosófica travestida de ciência...

Que tal dar uma olhada neste livro aqui?

Sparks of Life: Darwinism and the Victorian Debates over Spontaneous Generation (Paperback)

James E. Strick

Editorial Reviews

Review

A very important contribution to the literature of the spontaneous generation debates, one that ties together many parts of the story that have never been dealt with in one place. More important, Strick has placed his narrative in the context not only of recent scholarship on Pasteur, Tyndall, Huxley, and the X-Club, but he also provides a contextualist analysis that shows far more clearly exactly how and why the debates took the course they did. A very fine piece of work.
--Garland E. Allen, Washington University (20010401)

By focusing on Darwin's London and Pasteur's Paris, explaining the issues and historical approaches to both, Strick knits together the academic topics of Darwinian evolution, the Pasteurization of France, and germ theories of disease--by means of a deep study of specific Darwinian medical men in England and their recourse to spontaneous generation. We thereby sense that the book is pleasingly overarching, while at the same time focused.
--Adrian Desmond, author of Huxley:From Devil's Disciple to Evolution's High Priest (20010801)

With impressive scholarship, Strick examines the major books, articles, lectures, and letters on, as well as experiments and institutions involved with, the origin of life controversies in scientific philosophy. He rigorously analyzes the complex Victorian (1860-80) debates surrounding the idea of spontaneous generation...He also emphasizes the social aspects and personal interests that influenced those arguments offered by both naturalists and physicians. The result of prodigious research, Sparks of Life is highly recommended.
--H. James Birx (Library Journal 20010209)

Between 1860 and 1880, the scientific community vigorously debated the doctrine of spontaneous generation...and it held sway for generations before being challenged in the era of Darwin's theory of evolution. Strick investigates the evidence brought to bear on this controversy, including improvements in microscope technology, laboratory techniques, and experimental method, all of which helped author germ theory. Strick also treats conceptual changes and public controversy that lay beneath the research and scientific advances of Darwin's era. (Science News )

[Strick] explores the debate in Victorian Britain (1860-80) over the view that life was formed from nonliving matter (spontaneous generation or abiogenesis), against the background of controversy generated by Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and development of the germ theory of disease...The author strives to connect...diverse issues, making the work...attractive to those well versed in the scientific and historical details.
--J.S. Schwartz (Choice )

Sparks of Life provides a fascinating, scholarly account of the 19th century spontaneous generation controversy that raged in England which focuses on the work of Henry Charlton Bastian...Strick's highly readable account of English microbiology during the late Victorian period is superb and unlikely to be bettered--a must for everyone interested in the development of both microbiology and biology in general.
--Milton Wainwright (Microbiology Today )

In accessible language and an engaging narrative style, Strick navigates through the Victorian power politics of both observational and experimental science (Darwin's immediate 19th-century legacy) and the old (and inevitable) rifts between men of science and arrogant medical practitioners. He illuminates especially the European backdrop and the relations of the debates over spontaneous generation to the "big questions."
--Lynn Margulis (Science )

Product Description
How, asks James E. Strick, could spontaneous generation--the idea that living things can suddenly arise from nonliving materials--come to take root for a time (even a brief one) in so thoroughly unsuitable a field as British natural theology? No less an authority than Aristotle claimed that cases of spontaneous generation were to be observed in nature, and the idea held sway for centuries. Beginning around the time of the Scientific Revolution, however, the doctrine was increasingly challenged; attempts to prove or disprove it led to important breakthroughs in experimental design and laboratory techniques, most notably sterilization methods, that became the cornerstones of modern microbiology and sped the ascendancy of the germ theory of disease.

The Victorian debates, Strick shows, were entwined with the public controversy over Darwin's theory of evolution. While other histories of the debates between 1860 and 1880 have focused largely on the experiments of John Tyndall, Henry Charlton Bastian, and others, Sparks of Life emphasizes previously understudied changes in the theories that underlay the debates. Strick argues that the disputes cannot be understood without full knowledge of the factional infighting among Darwinians themselves, as they struggled to create a socially and scientifically viable form of "Darwinian" science. He shows that even the terms of the debate, such as "biogenesis," usually but incorrectly attributed to Huxley, were intensely contested.


NOTA

1. HUXLEY, Thomas. "I beg you once more to recollect that I have no right to call my opinion anything but an act of philosophical faith", in Discourses Biological and Geological: Essays (1894)p. 255-257.